Comments on: What Makes Astrology Tick? The $64,000 Question

By: R.L. Ohlhausen

R.L. Ohlhausen — Tue, 07 Aug 2012 16:43:23 +0000

I would have thought with all of the brain power out there, this question would no longer have to even be asked. OF COURSE, astrology is natural! And it can be proven… People just are thinking, that’s the real issue. There are many ways OTHER than testing the ‘oh-so subjective psyche’ to answer that question. And I will give you a hint, EVERY piece of scientific data needed to prove it has already been published. “As above so below”… We’ve been looking from “so below” too long, time to get on top of the situation. First you’ve got to get onboard with these TWO things. Astrology IS NATURAL and it is a SCIENCE. More so, it is synthesis of all science (that’s the harder thing for people to grasp). Time to get on with it. ~RLO

By: myptonnojeste

myptonnojeste — Tue, 15 Mar 2011 03:27:30 +0000

If we long to believe that the stars rise and set for us, that we are the reason there is a Universe, does science do us a disservice in deflating our conceits?

By: R K

R K — Sun, 13 Feb 2011 02:10:51 +0000

This article is nearly 11 years old and has been at Stariq.com for years now. It is misleadingly presented as current; we don’t find out the truth until after the article. Why are we given recycled material? Has Mr. Hand played himself out and now only sits in the corner repeating himself? It would be nice if we could move forward a little bit.

By: Lillith

Lillith — Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:58:45 +0000

PS.
Also, a $64,000 question. What makes God tick?

By: Lillith

Lillith — Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:56:08 +0000

The existence of God is parallel to the validity of Astrology. In either case, there is no “irrefutable” proof to hang ones hat that human activities are affected as a result. Both belief systems are subjective, based on personal experience and are often a matter of “faith and long term study”. Gods followers will often offer scripture as references, while astrologers correlate planetary transits. Both for all practical purposes and intent are parallel analogies.